H2020FP7HORIZONEDF
Bundesinstitut Fuer Risikobewertung
- Country
- DEGermany
- Defence projects
- 1
- Projects, all programmes
- 53
- As coordinator
- 1
- EU contribution (CORDIS)
- EUR 31,387,210
- Active
- 2008 to 2024
Projects
53 projects, newest first
| Project | Programme | Year | Role | EU contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeeingNanoDeveloping and Enabling Nanotechnology Awareness-Building through the Creation and Exchange of enhanced Communication and Visualisation Tools and Guidance for ‘Seeing at the Nanoscale’ | H2020 | 2014 | Participant | EUR 75,675 |
| FOODINTEGRITYEnsuring the Integrity of the European food chain | FP7 | 2014 | Participant | EUR 115,123 |
| SPICEDSecuring the spices and herbs commodity chains in Europe against deliberate, accidental or natural biological and chemical contamination | FP7 | 2013 | Coordinator | EUR 951,958 |
| EFFORTEcology from Farm to Fork Of microbial drug Resistance and Transmission | FP7 | 2013 | Participant | EUR 476,264 |
| NANOREGA common European approach to the regulatory testing of nanomaterials | FP7 | 2013 | Participant | EUR 66,645 |
| NANODEFINEDevelopment of an integrated approach based on validated and standardized methods to support the implementation of the EC recommendation for a definition of nanomaterial | FP7 | 2013 | Participant | EUR 103,611 |
| NANOPINIONMonitoring public opinion on Nanotechnology in Europe | FP7 | 2012 | Participant | EUR 60,990 |
| PROMISEProtection of consumers by microbial risk mitigation through combating segregation of expertise | FP7 | 2012 | Participant | EUR 281,320 |
| TDSEXPOSURETotal Diet Study Exposure | FP7 | 2012 | Participant | EUR 719,604 |
| QUALITYNANOA pan-European infrastructure for quality in nanomaterials safety testing | FP7 | 2011 | Participant | EUR 202,236 |
| QSAFFEQuality and Safety of Feeds and Food for Europe | FP7 | 2011 | Participant | EUR 276,800 |
| PERFOODPERFluorinated Organics in Our Diet | FP7 | 2009 | Participant | EUR 133,030 |
| ESNATSEmbryonic Stem cell-based Novel Alternative Testing Strategies | FP7 | 2008 | Participant | Not stated |
The country is the one the source records for the organisation’s registration (its PIC), and each profile says what it rests on. Where the record contradicts itself (the address in one country, the site name and the VAT number in another) we follow the two that agree: the Spanish research council CSIC is shown under Spain although its address is recorded in Italy. A body with sites in several countries is shown under the first of them in alphabetical order, and its profile lists the others. Beyond that we do not guess.
Where this comes from
- CORDIS: EU research projects (Horizon Europe, Horizon 2020, FP7)Last read on . Licence: Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (reuse of Commission documents). Source: CORDIS, European Commission.Participants and amounts as the Commission's CORDIS database states them (reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU).
- European Defence Fund: project factsheets of the call resultsLast read on . Licence: Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (reuse of Commission documents). Source: European Commission, DG DEFIS, EDF results factsheets.European Defence Fund participants are read from the project factsheets that DG DEFIS publishes, by a language model; every name is checked against the factsheet text and a name that is not in it is dropped. The factsheets state no amount per participant.
EU contribution is the amount CORDIS's open data pays to the participant. For a participant with linked third parties it may include their share (the CORDIS page prints the net); an amount the data does not hold is left out, not counted as zero. EDF factsheets state none per participant, so EDF projects count as projects but add nothing to the amounts.
Organisation-level facts only: a name, a country, a role, an amount, a year. A participant is recognised by its PIC where the source gives one, otherwise by name; the page says which. How the data is built.
Names are as CORDIS and the EDF project factsheets publish them. We do not list an organisation whose name looks like a natural person’s. If this entry is you, or a business named after you, and you want it removed, write to the contact in the imprint; the privacy notice (sections 7 and 9) says how a request is handled.